Obama Has At Least One SD Vote; And A Prediction (And Make Yours!)
Speaking of which.
How much do you think Barack will win by on June 3d? Put your predictions in comments.
I predict a solid win for Sen. Man Crush--57 to 43 percent. That might be a little optimistic. But I expect at least a ten point win.
Why?
1. Daschle factor. South Dakota Democrats like Tom Daschle. And Tom Hearts Barack.
2. All the other major Democrats back Barack--Sen. Tim Johnson, Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, Committee People Sharon Stroschein, Chairman Jack Billion, and Sen. George McGovern all have Obamafever.
3. The Obama campaign is running a field campaign for the primary, the likes of which this state hasn't seen. More staff, more seasoned staff, more volunteers, more money, more resources. And they've been in place about a month longer than Sen. Hillary Clinton's troops.
4. Sen. Obama has won all of the surrounding states already. I'd find it hard to believe South Dakota suddenly loves Hillary more. I'm just sayin'.
5. Sen. Obama needs wins--and big wins--in Montana and South Dakota--the last two primaries--for a post-primary bounce. It is the final knife in the Clinton campaign and an not too subtle sign to the Superdelegates about who has the best chance of changing the electoral map.
But that's why they have elections. The Clinton campaign has been extremely aggressive as of late in our state. June 3d should be fun to watch!
Technorati Tags: South Dakota, primary, Presidential Election, 2008 election, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton
Celebrating 50 Years of Schoenbeckiness
I again break my self-imposed exile for important news.My good Republican friend Lee Schoenbeck--former S.D. state legislator, oft mentioned candidate for governor, and great beige hunter--turns 50 years old today.
I can't imagine being that old. Wait, I'm 49 and turn 50 this year. I guess I'll have to face my own mortality soon just as Lee is doing today.
Anyway, hunting buddy and blog commenter, have a wonderful birthday!
Photo: Lawyer, legislator, hunter, and now, AARP eligible--Lee Schoenbeck of Watertown, SD.
Technorati Tags: Lee Schoenbeck, Watertown, South Dakota, legislators, GOP
Latest News, Views, Results, Analysis, & Twitters on W. Virginia Primary
Technorati Tags: West Virginia Primary, 2008 election, Presidential Primaries, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton
Media Matters: Invasion of the Pro-Pentagon Military Analysts on TV
Media Matters has done a study on the invasion of military experts on the nation’s airwaves and cablewaves. Don’t assume you’re getting unbiased analysis. There is apparently an agenda—a pro-Pentagon/Bush Administration agenda at work with many of the retired military brass and others who comment on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and other conflicts.
Item Summary:
http://mediamatters.org/items/200805130001
Military analysts named in Times exposé appeared or were quoted more than 4,500 times on broadcast nets, cables, NPR
A New York Times article detailed the connection between numerous media military analysts and the Pentagon and defense industries, reporting that “the Bush administration has used its control over access and information in an effort to transform” media military analysts “into a kind of media Trojan horse — an instrument intended to shape terrorism coverage from inside the major TV and radio networks.” A Media Matters review found that since January 1, 2002, the analysts named in the Times article — many identified as having ties to the defense industry — collectively appeared or were quoted as experts more than 4,500 times on ABC, ABC News Now, CBS, CBS Radio Network, NBC, CNN, CNN Headline News, Fox News, MSNBC, CNBC, and NPR. (Read more…)
Full Item Below:
http://mediamatters.org/items/200805130001
Military analysts named in Times exposé appeared or were quoted more than 4,500 times on broadcast nets, cables, NPR
On April 20, The New York Times published an article by investigative reporter David Barstow that detailed the connection between numerous media military analysts and the Pentagon and defense industries. Barstow reported that “the Bush administration has used its control over access and information in an effort to transform” media military analysts, many of whom have clients or work for companies with an interest in obtaining Pentagon contracts, “into a kind of media Trojan horse — an instrument intended to shape terrorism coverage from inside the major TV and radio networks.” A Media Matters review found that since January 1, 2002, the analysts named in Barstow’s article — many identified as having ties to the defense industry — collectively appeared or were quoted as experts more than 4,500 times on ABC, ABC News Now, CBS, CBS Radio Network, NBC, CNN, CNN Headline News, Fox News, MSNBC, CNBC, and NPR in segments covering the Iraq war both before and after the invasion, as well as numerous other national security or government policy issues.
A spreadsheet listing each of the analysts’ appearances documented by Media Matters is available here.
The following chart lists 20 analysts included in Barstow’s article, the network or networks on which each analyst appeared, and the number of appearances made by each analyst since January 1, 2002, as tabulated by Media Matters:
Technorati Tags: military, commentary, TV news, war covverage, Media Matters
Military analyst
Networks
Number of appearances identified by Media Matters
David L. Grange
CNN, CNN Headline News
921
Donald W. Shepperd
CNN
713
Barry R. McCaffrey
NBC, MSNBC, CNBC
642
James Marks
CNN
299
Rick Francona
NBC, MSNBC, CNBC
296
Wayne A. Downing
NBC, MSNBC, CNBC
270
Robert H. Scales Jr.
Fox News, National Public Radio
176 (Fox News)
73 (NPR)*
William V. Cowan
Fox News
189
Kenneth Allard
NBC, MSNBC, CNBC
180
Thomas G. McInerney
Fox News
144
Montgomery Meigs
NBC, MSNBC, CNBC
125
Robert L. Maginnis
Fox News
113
William L. Nash
ABC, ABC News Now
96
Paul E. Vallely
Fox News
81
Charles T. Nash
Fox News
54
Robert S. Bevelacqua
Fox News
48
Jeffrey D. McCausland
CBS, CBS Radio Network
43
Timur J. Eads
Fox News
28
Joseph W. Ralston
CBS, CBS Radio Network
19
John C. Garrett
Fox News
8
NOTE: Transcripts for all programs on CNN are available in the Nexis database, but for the other cable news networks transcripts are available for only some shows.
*This figure includes 31 appearances from 2005 and later, when — according to NPR media correspondent David Folkenflik — Scales was no longer serving as an official NPR consultant but rather was an unpaid guest.
Methodology
Media Matters used the Nexis database to tabulate appearances by analysts on networks with which they were affiliated that included discussions of issues related to national security or U.S. government policy. Instances in which analysts appeared on networks other than those with which they were affiliated were not counted. Media Matters counted as appearances both instances in which an analyst appeared as a guest on a show — either live during the show, or in a pre-taped interview aired during the show — either live during the show, or in a pre-taped interview aired during the show — and instances in which a report included a clip of an analyst’s commentary. The study was limited to appearances made after January 1, 2002.
Re-airings of news programs in their entirety were excluded from the study. However, instances in which the same report, interview, or quote was aired on different shows or more than once during the course of the same program were counted as separate appearances in this study. If an analyst appeared several separate times during the same show, Media Matters counted each one as a distinct appearance.
Nexis includes transcripts for all news programs on CNN but for the other cable news networks transcripts are available for only some shows; appearances on programs whose transcripts do not appear in Nexis were not included in this study.
Finally, the Times article reported that some of the analysts “pointed out, accurately, that they did not always agree with the administration or each other” and that “[m]any analysts strongly denied that they had either been co-opted or had allowed outside business interests to affect their on-air comments, and some have used their platforms to criticize the conduct of the war.” In conducting this study, Media Matters did not assess whether individual instances of commentary — or the analysts themselves — were supportive of administration policy.
Full Text and Excerpts from the Hunt Trustee Lawsuit Against Hyperion's Huddleston
I emerge from my hiatus with some interesting news on the Hunt Trustee litigation against Hyperion’s Albert Huddleston. I have obtained a copy of the Texas lawsuit (click here for .pdf
4-29-08 Original Petition re Vranac v. Legacy, Inc. et al.pdf) as well as a listing of major players in Hyperion from the Texas Secretary of State’s Office (click here
Hyperion Mgt team.mht).
The lawsuit is interesting reading, with some literary flourishes not always found in often dry petitions (complaints).
For example:
“… Since his marriage to Mary (Huddleston), Albert has pursued a variety of businesses—always unsuccessfully. Although he holds the title of chief executive officer of Legacy (the Hunt trust’s corporation that produces most of its income), his efforts in that position have been unproductive, expensive, and self-aggrandizing… . “
“… Albert (Huddleston) is well-known for his failed business ventures… . “
“… Albert (Huddleston) also requested that a distribution of an additional $20 million be made to Mary (Huddleston) to fund other misquided projects in Iraq and South Dakota. When Plaintiff informed him he was not agreeable to a distribution for these proposed expenditures, Albert became upset and threatened Plaintiff with a lawsuit… . “
Well, so much for Big Al having the Golden Touch. This is who Gov. Mike Rounds has climbed into bed with on this project.
I’m just sayin’.
Technorati Tags: Albert Huddleston, Mary Huddleston, Gorilla Project, Hyperion, Mary Hunt, Texas, refinery, lawsuits
Meanwhile, Here Are Some Twitters From Todd To Keep You Reading
Sure, Twitters are a poor excuse for real blog posts, but hey, they’re better than nothing. They’ll be about all I have time for. Enjoy while I take care of other matters during the next month!




