Today's Big Take: While Bush Lied, the Democrats Hid
With the indictment of Lewis "Scooter" Libby, the Vice President's Chief of Staff, in the Plamegate scandal, perhaps our nation will finally get to the bottom of how the Bush Administration lied about the reasons for invading Iraq in 2003.
I welcome this inquiry. This war is a terrible mistake.
But Democrats need to bear part of the responsibility of this debacle.
Major Democrat U.S. Senators John Kerry, Joe Liebermann, Hillary Clinton, and yes, our own Tom Daschle did not say and do enough to oppose the war. In fact, most Democratic lawmakers supported the war. They now claim they were "duped," but that argument is hard to buy. I know that privately, Daschle had great misgivings about the war. But why did he not speak out until it was too late?
Our own Democrat U.S. Rep. Stephanie Herseth campaigned that she supported the Bush Administration's prosecution of the war. There was a lack of Democrat guts on this issue.
Back in during the Vietnam War, our U.S. Senators, Jim Abourezk and George McGovern, courageously opposed that misadventure. So did other Republican and Democrat Senators and Congressmen.
As a former Democrat, I cannot begin to tell you how disappointed I am that my party did not do the right thing and oppose the Iraq War and question its prosecution. Instead, it did the politically expedient thing for the short term and became Bush's lap dog. Now, they don't have the credibility to strongly oppose the war because they look like they are merely taking advantage in the change in public opinion.
While the Bush Administration bears the bulk of responsibility for this stupid war, the "big" Democrats need to bear part of the burden as well for shirking their duty as the "loyal opposition" and as decent, humane, and patriotic Americans. Perhaps if they had spoken out louder when it mattered, we wouldn't be in the mess we are in now in Iraq.

Reader Comments (5)
In all fairness, Tom Daschle did make his "I am saddened" speech on the Senate floor, and it played over and over again during the campaign to the derisive glee of the Republicans. And their only claim to a voice in the matter at this point is their immense immoral authority.
In the show last night, Dick Durbin, whose only fault is that he apologized for something he did not say or imply, pointed out that the Senate did not even have an intelligence summary report when it was asked to vote on authorizing Bush to use force. That is where the Democrats did not do enough.
They cowered before the "soft on terrorism" charge like puppies who get caught piddling on the kitchen floor. I agree with other posters on blogs who think that they ought to be held accountable at the primary ballot box for their wimpiness. Now we have 2,014 dead Americans and 26-30,000 Iraqi civilians for them to account for.
And Howard Dean looms as more and more important.
I heard Sen. McGovern say on Mn Public Radio just recently, that before old men should think up more wars they should sign up to carry a rifle in the war. And if they were too infirm to carry a rifle, they should go ahead of the infantry to set off the mines.
In the same interview, Sen. McGovern said that he had never stopped believing that there were wars worth fighting.
The problems with the Bush propaganda for the Iraq war were painfully obvious long before the Senate gave him a free ticket. Democratic cowardice in Congress on the issue appalled me then and still pisses me off.
Patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels. Seeing our flag waving in a good breeze can almost bring tears to my eyes, but we must ever be suspicious of those who wave the flag in connection with narrow partisan political objectives.Flag waving (and now "fighting terrorism'} should be early warnings to us by now.