« Sen. John Thune's Twin? | Main | S.D. Watch adds Comment Section Re Sibby, S.D. Politics, and Argus Leader »

A Very Special "Outing" Week in SoDakBlogOLand

Mighty Righty Ryne McClaren actually has a pretty good piece about all the "outing" going on this week in SoDakBlogOLand.  He at has least one good point I agree with:

Now here's my question: If you start a blog, wouldn't it just be a hell of a lot easier to start signing your name to your posts on Day 1?

I think the best answer is yes.

However, some people choose not too, which is a fact of the BlogOSphere.  That includes my good virtual friend, S.D. Blog Watch Man.

So, SDBWM shut down rather than risk outing.  Theron McChesney (thunewatch.com) and Nathan Peterson (PIADW) self outed, perhaps in response to my earlier story about the Robert Novak researcher giving me a call.  Then again, maybe not.  Maybe, to coin a phrase, "It's time."  (Don't any of you other guys have listed phone numbers the MSM can call?)

Anyway, I did want to clarify one of Ryne's points that I'm not sure I made real clear in my initial audio posting:  The Novakista didn't know who SDBWM was but knew of him.  He wanted me to spill the beans.  I didn't and anyway, I didn't know who he was at the time.  I have subsequently learned who SDBWM is.  My lips are sealed.

Novak's myrmidon (Success! I used it in a sentence!) also wanted me to spill the beans on Theron, who I knew (I didn't spill said beans) and Nathan (who I didn't know and don't know and so couldn't have spilled said beans if I had wanted to).  The ruthlessly enthralled Novakian did know about Chad Schuldt (CCK). 

So, I upheld the LeftyOSphere's vow of omerta.  Novak Researcher Dude also thought I was a former Daschle staffer.  I am not, just a friend and supporter who did a very small amount of legal work for the campaign committee much prior to the election.  I ride alone.  (Maybe I need to change my deodorant.)  But why does everyone think I'm Tom's former employee?  No, no, no, no I am not.

I did find it kind of funny that Bob Novak, deep in the midst of the Valerie Plame outing, was sniffing around this. 

Now that most everyone is in the blogging sunshine (there's an oxymoron, with emphasis on the moron part), I would image Bulldog Bob's anti-Thune story will probably evaporate, but hey, who knows.  I'm just Girls Soccer Coach Pajama Fat Boy Lawyer (GSCPFBL for short).  I could be wrong.

Does anyone besides us bloggers care about this whole topic?  Seems a little too inside the game for most folks.

Posted on Friday, July 29, 2005 by Registered CommenterTodd Epp in | Comments8 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (8)

My guess is Novak is sniffing around the South Dakota blogosphere at the behest of Thune's taxpayer-financed staffer Jon Lauck.

My guess is his goal is to stomp out any opinion that is detrimental to Senator Thune.

What a sad waste of taxpayer dollars in the Thune office. One would think they would have the business of the people to deal with rather than playing pathetic politics out of their official office.

It will catch up with them. Just give it time.
July 29, 2005 | Unregistered CommenterChad
Energy Bill, Highway Bill, and now the Second Amendmnet received protection. All in a days work for John Thune. All things that died in the Daschle Dead Zone.

Thune is getting it done...it is the Dumped Daschle Discples who are the whiners.
July 29, 2005 | Unregistered CommenterSteve Sibson
sibby would you now say that thune is getting it done on crossing over and attaching his nameto senator johnson amendment number 1042 for mandatory health care,or as you would now call him a socialist, as you said any one who who was for v.a health care is a socialist.thank you for now naming him that as with his clout we will see if it pass in the senate in september thank you for helping to point out thune is a socialist or should i say democrat now.
July 30, 2005 | Unregistered Commentercommander jr
sibby would you now say that thune is getting it done on crossing over and attaching his nameto senator johnson amendment number 1042 for mandatory health care,or as you would now call him a socialist, as you said any one who who was for v.a health care is a socialist.thank you for now naming him that as with his clout we will see if it pass in the senate in september thank you for helping to point out thune is a socialist or should i say democrat now.
July 30, 2005 | Unregistered Commentercommander jr
Mighty Bob Novak writing a couple of hundred words about Daschle's unprecedented perpetual campaign at the "behest" of Jon Lauck? That has to be one of the most asinine allegations I've ever heard, and I've heard a lot of them.

Who in here thinks that Jon Lauck has the power to call down Bob Novak from the heavens as if he were some sort of right-wing blogger's thunderbolt? C'mon, raise your hands. That's what I thought.

Tom Daschle (or A Lot of People Supporting Tom Daschle, if you prefer) is doing something that has never been done before in that he's still operating as though he's running for something. The FEC noticed. The national media and the punditocracy have noticed. I find that there is nothing very sinister about that.
July 30, 2005 | Unregistered CommenterRyne McClaren
Ryne,

The NRSC lawyer who have been passing around the now infamous "FEC letter" you refer to have admitted that they were asked to do so by none other than Jon Lauck.

He is on official government payroll and he is still running a perpetual campaign against an opponent his guy has already defeated by having NRSC lawyers call reporters about routine FEC business.

Asinine? Perhaps the activity coming out of the Thune taxpayer-financed office is. The idea that Lauck is behind this is definetely not.
July 30, 2005 | Unregistered CommenterChad
I'd like to ask a question about the Steve

Hildebrand bloggers? What prompted their

sudden "complete disclosure"? Being a

virtual political amateur, I thought it

would be an interesting question to ask.

July 30, 2005 | Unregistered CommenterErin
Chad,

Oh my heavens.

Are you meaning to tell me that Jon Lauck, in his capacity as an employee of John Thune's office, talked the NRSC guy into talking about a public FEC filing? A public filing that directly affects South Dakotans and, by at least some measure, American political campaigns? Knock me over with a feather, I can't possibly *imagine* this happening in partisan politics.

And please, spare me the "They're running a perpetual campaign against *our* perpetual campaign!" drama. I don't think that it really needs to be pointed out, but allow me to paraphrase something that you said above: Why is the Daschle machine still running a perpetual campaign against the man that defeated Tom?
July 30, 2005 | Unregistered CommenterRyne McClaren

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>