Which SD Public University Should Be Closed?

Denise Ross over at The Hog House and Cory Heidelberger at the Madville Times both have well written and researched stories on one legislator’s proposed bill to shutter one of South Dakota’s state institutions of higher learning.
The theory is that if small K-12 schools need to close for economy sake, why not higher ed giving up some tenure?
Also, with the University Center (formerly USDSU) in Sioux Falls essentially becoming a seventh state university, is the state spreading its resources too thin?
My own thoughts on this is Rep. Mark Kirkeby (R-Rapid City) may (repeat MAY) have a good idea, but unless Gov. Mike Rounds is willing to expend a huge amount of political capital to close a school—which would likely be one of the smaller schools, such as Mines, BHSU, NSU, or DSU—it is not going to happen.
There are still plenty of people smarting over the closure of USD-Springfield in the early 1980s when Gov. Bill Janklow spent considerable time, effort, and political capital to turn the college into a prison. I would argue that only someone of Janklow’s political skills, single-mindedness, and toughness could get a college closed. I don’t see the current Governor wanting to take on such a battle—particularly if he has any inkling of running for the U.S. Senate this year or if he wants to spend the rest of his term mired in the nastiness of such a fight.
It was one thing to take on a small school like USDS in a small town like Springfield. But take on Rapid City and Mines? Fuggettaboutit! Take on Spearfish over BHSU? Nah. Take on Aberdeen over NSU? Nope. Take on Madison over DSU? Well, maybe, but doubtful.
Frankly, as higher education and technical education becomes even more important as our economy continues to change and grow, I think there is a good argument that our citizens—not just college aged citizens—need more, not less access to higher education. Higher ed and technical education also draw research and economic development. So, personally, I would hate to see any of the current colleges get axed.
But still, this Washburn University of Topeka and University of Houston graduate thinks it would be fun to ponder which school is the weak sister in the family of South Dakota higher education.
Here’s my school by school analysis in order of non-closeability:
1. SDSU—No brainer. Our only DI school that’s also a land grant college in an agricultural state. Also, too many alums to let it happen.
2. USD—No brainer. A soon to be DI school with most of the state’s professional schools in business, law, and medicine. Again, too many alums to screw with.
3. University Center—No brainer. The powers that be have made this happen. Sioux Falls is a growing community that needs more (and cheaper) educational opportunities for a metropolitan area. In ten years, this will be South Dakota’s largest university.
Now it gets tougher.
4. SDSM&T—Perhaps a surprise. But as Gov. Rounds pushes for more research, its proximity to SDUSEL, and its tremendous reputation as an engineering and scientific school, I think it is safe. Or at least it should be. If I were a smart kid who loved math and science, no matter where I was from, this is where I’d go to school.
5. DSU—A small school in a small town but it has an extremely focused mission that puts it in the forefront of today’s technology, use of computing, and integration of computing across all disciplines. Also highly regarded for what it does nationally. Also, Heidelberger would be forced to enter the real world and no one wants that.
6. NSU—The best thing it has going for it is that it provides higher education in the state’s third largest community. The state would be stupid to leave that corner of the state without a college. Plus, I’d hate to see Schaff and Blanchard have to find real jobs.
7. BHSU—This is not a knock on the school or its quality but it seems to have the least focus of any of the state’s colleges. It’s programs could be moved to Rapid City at Mines and give Mines a college of Liberal Arts. However, Spearfish is going to be a community that continues to grow. It will likely be a place where the SDUSEL scientists and staffers live. And those smarty-pants like college towns.
Again, I would hate to see any of the schools close because more higher ed, not less, will make South Dakota and South Dakotans more competitive as well as smarter.
My guess is that the closure issue will get some debate but it will die well before the end of the 2008 session.
In the meantime, vote for which school you think should close if push comes to shove.
Technorati Tags: South Dakota, higher education, legislature, Gov. Mike Rounds, Rep. Mark Kirkeby, DSU, NSU, BHSU, SDSU, USD, SDSM&T, University Center, Sioux Falls, Rapid City, Madison, Aberdeen, Spearfish, Springfield
Powered by ScribeFire.

Reader Comments (7)
One important distinction between K-12 and the universities. In the past ten years or so, enrollment at the universities in UP something like 25%.
Epp's just worried I'll go into law and drive him out of business. I am the real world's worst nightmare. Keep DSU to save my job? Heck, do it to save Epp's job! ;-)
Seriously, the better question might be, given our ability to find resources to support the expanding and necessary roles of our university system, why can we not find the political will to find resources to support the expanding needs of the K-12 system?
I can't think of a single University that should be shut down. Certainly not DSU - I'm really impressed with their offerings and what they've turned their programs into. If I could do over, that's where I'd want to go. If it remains on cutting edge of technology, it's where I'd want my kids to go.
Not NSU. Their big, mirrored glass nightmare of architecture on campus aside, the town couldn't take losing the University.
Hey Todd,
Try this one on for size and give me your feedback. Sell the Mines campus in Rapid to a private developer who could turn it into a high-priced area for homes and condos ( and write a percentage into the sales agreement). Then move their course offerings to Spearfish. We don't lose any students but we do combine two schools into one larger school, eliminate any redundant spending, and hopefully make some money off the Mines sale. Rapid City could absorb that loss better than Spearfish could.
The state should only have two public universities: the land grant school and the U. The outlyier schools should be branches of the U: the U at northern, at Spearfish, etc. This would be more politically palitable in the short term, buy time for the bigger cuts in the future, and should result in a 50% savings in administration and bureaucracy. Repubs are fond of crowing that government should be run like a business (because they don't understand the difference) - well, they should get on with it regarding higher ed.
close them all and send them to sioux falls thats the going place.Wages are better here compared to west river, And when we get to be the biggest, we will have all the representation in the Senate and the House.Elect Rounds to the Senate, he is a true conservative.The reason is he doesnt even fund education in the state.