« The Big SDPTV Show | Main | Light Posting Ahead »

The Sibby v. PP Feud: A Great SDGOP Tradition

Local Republican bloggers PP at SD War College and Steve Sibson at Sibby Online are going at each other about who is doing the most harm to the S.D. Republican Party and who is the most real/best/holiest Republican.


Since Republicans have run this state since before statehood in 1889, their internal machinations have been frequent and probably more important than what was has going on in my own Democratic Party.  Their intramural fight is the preliminary bout to the varsity match with the Democrats.

When the Mainstream Coalition was announced back in 2005, I wrote the following on the Home Edition of SD Watch:

Several of my SoDak blogger friends on the GOP side of the virtual fence like to deride the newly formed MAINstream Colation

It was initially formed by a number of centrist state legislators who have had their fill of their more Rightward brothers slamming religion down their throats in the halls of the Legislature.

While the MAINstreamers’ organization may be a first organized breakaway based on religion and personal rights from the Stalwart wing of the state Republican, it is by no means the first in the state’a and territory’s history.

Since state Democrats have typically had a difficult time winning Statehouse races throughout S.D. history and sometimes even barely existing as a party, the Republicans have been where the action is. 

Essentially, through much of S.D.’s history, there has been a tension between Republican Populists/Progressives and the Stalwarts.  In the past, the division was based on economic issues.

Prof. Herbert Schell explains one such episode in his as yet unsurpassed History of South Dakota.  Once such movement within the Republican party occurred in 1896, when free silver was the big issue of the day.

South Dakota Republicans have almost always had at least two factions—stalwarts who are always the most conservative of their time, whether it was based on economics or social issues—and moderates—who are typically less ideological, and more results oriented.

Today I think you’d say Sen. John Thune is a stalwart and former Gov. Bill Janklow is a moderate.

Same thing Back in the Day.  Many of the early Republican governors and Senators were stalwarts; people like Peter Norbeck and Richard Pettigrew were moderates.

So, it is the same song, different verse for my SDGOP friends; the venue is just different—the blogosphere.

(Cross-posted to Badlands Blue and SDW @ KELOLAND.com)

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Powered by ScribeFire.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

Interesting post, Epp. You are right - there truly is "nothing new under the sun."

You are right about one thing - the reason the Dems don't have more internal strife is that they have a hard enough time winning when they are all together!

I've always thought that SD should switch over to a parliamentary system - maybe with five or six little parties. We could have "Pro-lifers," "Educrats," "Fiscal conservatives," "ag guys," etc. It would more accurately reflect what actually goes on in Pierre.

December 19, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterRexellfrentz

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>