Olbermann is Obama's cable TV campaign manager. What did you expect? (If O'Reilly, who isn't half as nasty as Olbermann, had said: "Obama has no business being President, you would be all over it, and not in a good way.) And I'm no fan of Billary, but anyone who thinks that there was something sinister about her remark is nuts, and grasping at straws. She was talking about a timeline and long the selection of a nominee has taken in the past. End of story...except for the breathless Obama Kool-Aid drinkers who want it to continue.

If you look at the laundry list of Clinton gaffes -- the press, the public really have overlooked alot.

Olbermann actually was quite kind and reaching out to the Clinton campaign earlier with a toned down Special Comment right after Clinton's "I have experience, Sen. McCain has experience, Obama wrote a speech." tactic. Olbermann was quite conflicted about it as he respected and appreciated support from the Clinton family regarding his special comments directed at the Bush administration. Olbermann's observation and concern and his address really hit home to me as I have had a really tough time with HRC putting herself above good for the party with her tactics.

What I find amazing is that if HRC could have actually really apologized vs the usual slimy Washington politician non-apology route ... much would be avoided. She's never bothered saying "I was wrong." regarding Iraq, nor admitted error or being wrong yesterday. I can forgive clumsy phrases and wording. This gaffe, however, was more. It was Freudian ... and with a darker insight to HRC than I'd really want to see. To connect a timeline dealing with primaries and running into June ... there were other situations or candidates she could have brought into instead of making a random jump to a Bobby Kennedy's murder. It's sad.

RFK Jr., a Hillary supporter, released a statement that he understands the context and people shouldn't be offended. If RFK's son gets it, why can't you people?

It's not about her calling for an assassination, Anonymous, which is what RFK Jr. referred to. She didn't actually do that, anyone properly using their brain knew that she didn't do that, and that's not the point at hand. RFK Jr. responded to something that didn't require response, really.

The point at hand is that THAT word -- assassination -- should never have passed her lips. It's a word that is entirely too charged in this campaign, when one's opponent has the distinction of being the first presidential candidate EVER to have received a Secret Service security detail so early in the campaign, and the possibility of assassination by one of the extremist white-power movements is all too real. It was a stupid word to use, and coming from someone who repeatedly tells us that she's a better option than the current administration and the McSame camp, it was a gaff of, thus far, unrivaled proportion.

And THEN there's the whole non-apology issue. Her true colors, which are heavily shaded with incompetence and avoidance, have pointedly come to light. This was a really dumb thing to say, and she hasn't apologized for it, instead, opting for rhetoric that mimics the current administration, paraphrased as "I'm sorry somebody got offended by what I said."

She just proved that her administration would be only slightly left of McSame. We can expect the same lack of judgment from her, and the same amount of misdirection, just with slightly more centric values. That's not really an improvement, and if people consider it to be one, their tolerance for failure in leadership is quite a bit too high.

We don't need a president with breasts just because all the non-breasted presidents of the past keep getting it wrong. We need a president with professionalism and leadership. She has made it quite clear, yet again, that she is not the answer to that need.

So why can't "YOU" people understand that?